Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Chamos

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing on both the original and cross appeals.

Andrew Chamos, an unnaturalized native of Hungary, was on March 6, 1918, employed by the Sudduth Coal Company as a workman in its coal mine in Pike county, Kentucky, and on that day he sustained an accidentan the course of his employment from the effects of which he died. The employer was operating under our Workmen’s Compensation Act (sections 4880-4987, both inclusive, of 1922 edition, Kentucky Statutes) and it was insured under that act by appellant, Maryland *821Casualty Company, and Chamos, before the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Giozza v. TiernanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Call v. HaunTennessee Supreme Court · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Liimatainen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Bradley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Vest's Administrator v. VestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API