Liimatainen v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by the action of the State Industrial Accident Commission in rejecting her claim for compensation for the death of her alleged husband, attempted to appeal to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Marion County. In that court, by her attorneys, she entered into a stipulation that the cause might be heard and determined by that court without the intervention of a jury upon certain agreed statements of facts which we condense in part as follows: That the commissioners, naming them, comprise the State Industrial Accident Commission; that on June 19, 1922,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Gregutis v. Waclark Wire WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Barrett v. Union Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McEwen v. McEwenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- McCain v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Roles Shingle Co. v. BergersonOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Robertson v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Cunningham v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.