Legal Opinion

Call v. Haun

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1850PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haun agreed with Call that if he would indemnify him against a note in hank, on which Haun was second, and Call third endorser, he, Haun, would release him, Call, from liability on three notes due from -Beasley and Hargiss to Haun, on which Call was surety. Haun being relieved of his liability as endorser with Call upon the note in bank, refused to comply with his agreement to cancel Call’s suretyship upon the three notes of which he Haun, was payee, but brought suit before a Justice of the peace upon the three notes, and recovered Judgments; which this bill was filed in Chancery to enjoin.…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stevens v. United Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Gobrecht v. BeckwithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Dustin v. CurtisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  4. Glenn v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Glory v. BagbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API