Legal Opinion
Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 1994No. 92 Civ. 1152 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
This class action (the “Maywatt Action”) arises out of a transaction (the “Transaction”) by which oil and gas limited partnerships were consolidated into a new entity pursuant to an exchange agreement. Former limited partners of these partnerships (the “Plaintiffs” or “Class Members”) bring this action against the general partner, the new company created through the exchange agreement, various individual officers and directors of the general partner, and the investment banking firm which rendered a fairness opinion regarding the Transaction. The Plaintiffs allege…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- McReynolds v. Richards-CantaveCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Roberts v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.