Legal Opinion

Taylor v. DuRose

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 29, 1967No. 67-C-68PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

ORDER

Appearing pro se, the plaintiff has filed a complaint against the three defendants alleging that they conspired to prevent him from earning his living by selling insurance. Each of the defendants has submitted an answer in which various affirmative defenses, including the lack of jurisdiction, are asserted.

On September 15, 1967, the court set up a briefing schedule requesting all the parties to submit memoranda relative to the affirmative defenses presented in the answers to the complaint.

On October 31, 1967, the court addressed a letter to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
  4. Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Gibbons v. Dexter Horton Trust & Savings BankDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gorman v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  2. Miclau v. MiclauDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API