Gorman v. King
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The same attorneys have appeared for the plaintiffs in each of the above-named three cases. In each case, the complaint on its face lacks a sufficient allegation of grounds to give the court subject matter jurisdiction. In this opinion, the court will determine whether to dismiss these cases on its own motion, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction.
Gorman et al. v. King, No. 70-C-145, involves many of the same parties *196and the same cause of action involved in Gorman et al. v. King, No. 70-0-42 (E.D. Wis. February 26, 1970). In the earlier…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. BarkhausenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Chicago Stadium Corporation, a Corporation v. The State of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Taylor v. DuRoseDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delome v. Union Barge Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- C. J. Paul Delome v. Union Barge Line Company, Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Platzer Shipyard, Inc., Third-Aprtydefendant-Appellee- CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971