Legal Opinion
Miclau v. Miclau
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided November 10, 1972No. Civ. No. 428-72Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TOLEDO, District Judge.
On May 9, 1972, plaintiff herein filed a complaint to recover monies and interests allegedly owed on a past due promissory note. Defendants answered the complaint on June 12, 1972, and on the same day, filed a motion for security of costs and attorneys fees, upon its assertion that the plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Cleveland, Ohio.
Rule 8(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28, United States Code, provides in part, the following :
“(a) A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bowman v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Pennsylvania Ass'n for Retarded Children v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.