Legal Opinion

Estate of Reed v. Hadley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2005No. 04CA41PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} The estate of Corinne M. Reed and Jacqueline Parker (collectively, “estate”) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for class certification. The estate argues that the court abused its discretion by denying certification based on its findings that the proposed class members did not all sign identical contracts and that proof of legal injuries to class members required individual evidence of damages. We conclude that it was unreasonable to find that the class should not be certified without examining the contracts to determine whether the similarities in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pivonka v. Sears, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  2. Nagel v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API