Litchfield v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDÉR
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 2) and Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. # 6). For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand her state law conversion claim. In light of this disposition, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant UPS, is rendered moot.
I
This action was originally filed in the Franklin County Common Pleas Court as one for conversion under state common law. The action was removed to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hannibal v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Edwards v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Kenneth Leroy Keith, II v. Benjamin Atkinson, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Metropolitan Title Agency, Inc. v. Fedex CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Puterbaugh v. AirTran AirwaysDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003