Legal Opinion

Jones v. Seawell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kiowa County; before F. E. Gillette, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

PaNCOAst, J.:

This was an action of forcible entry and detainer, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error in the justice's court, to recover possession of the northeast quarter of section sixteen, in township six, north, of range eighteen, west of the Indian meridian, in Kiowa county, Oklahoma.

The case was tried before a justice of the peace, and resulted in a judgment for the defendant, from which judgment the plaintiff appealed to the district court of Kiowa county. There the action was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, which, briefly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lyons v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Richardson v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bilby v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Scissem v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Miners' & Merchants' Bank v. BriceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API