Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Jay S. Mercier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 2014No. Docket Som-13-24PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Jay S. Mercier challenges the court’s (Nivison J.) 2012 entry of a judgment of conviction for a murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A) (2013), that occurred in 1980. Mercier argues that his right to confront witnesses was violated by the court’s admission of medical examiner testimony based in part on an autopsy report created by a different medical examiner who did not testify at trial. Mercier also contends that the court erred in admitting certain evidence at trial and in failing to fashion a sua sponte remedy for statements made by the prosecutor in closing argument. We affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  2. Smith v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  3. State of Maine v. Elfido Marroquin-AldanaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. State of Maine v. Richard J. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. State of Maine v. Roda O. Abdi State of Maine v. Ali-Nassir H. AhmedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API