Legal Opinion

McSweeney v. East Bay Transit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1943No. Civ. 12215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiff and his wife sued the defendants to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The action was tried by the trial court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants made a motion for a new trial. Their motion was denied and the defendants have appealed from the judgment.

The facts in the case involve a collision between an automobile and a motor coach at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and 90th Avenue in the city of Oakland. The collision occurred around 7 o’clock on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Medlin v. SpazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Wallace v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Zwerin v. Riverside Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Allen v. Bay Cities Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Hallman v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Huber v. Henry J. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API