Legal Opinion

Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 8, 1951No. Gen. 45,108PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Schwartz

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant moneys paid by plaintiff’s predecessors in interest (Alton Railroad Company and the Trustee thereof) in settlement of the claim of one Wehunt, a switchman. A motion to strike the second amended complaint was sustained and suit dismissed, from which order plaintiff appeals. Inasmuch as no point is made on the question of plaintiff’s succession, we will in this opinion call plaintiff and its predecessors the “railroad.”

On July 11, 1942 Wehunt was participating in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Lasko v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Allison v. Shell Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API