Legal Opinion
University of Utah Research Foundation v. Ambry Genetics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 2014No. 2014-1361, 2014-1366PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are the University of Utah Research Foundation, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, HSC Research and Development Limited Partnership, Endorecherche, Inc., and Myriad Genetics, Inc. (collectively “Myriad”). Myriad owns U.S. Patent No. 5,753,441 (“the '441 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 5,747,282 (“the '282 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 5,837,492 (“the '492 patent”), which cover compositions of matter and methods relating to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Defendant is Ambry Genetics Corporation (“Ambry”), a company that sells medical kits designed to test for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Genetic Technologies Limited v. Merial L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Rapid Litigation Management Ltd. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.