Tatnall v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying Joy Logan’s motions to reconsider and amend her pleadings to assert third party claims against Betty Jo Gardner. Because all third party claims are permissive, the trial court’s order denying Logan’s motions to reconsider and amend neither determines a substantial matter “forming the whole or part of some cause of action,” nor prevents “a judgment from being rendered in the action” from which Logan could appeal. Therefore, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal and it is dismissed without prejudice.
“The jurisdiction of a court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DAV Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Linda Mc Co., Inc. v. ShoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Wallace v. BeaverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.