In the Interest of L.S.R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
J.R. and L.R. appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to their daughter L.S.R., a judgment based upon a jury verdict. In eleven issues, they contend that: (1) the trial court erred by admitting a certified record of J.R.’s deferred adjudication probation for the offense of indecency with a child; (2) there is no evidence or factually insufficient evidence to terminate J.R.’s parental rights under section 161.001(l)(L)(iv) of the Texas Family Code; and (3) the evidence supporting the other remaining grounds for termination is factually insufficient. We reform the trial…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- In the Interest of D.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Swinney v. MosherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- In the Interest of K.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- in the Interest of A.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- In Re JFCTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re LSRCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In THE INTEREST OF Z.N., a CHILD v. the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.