Legal Opinion
Bryant v. Bonded Accounts Service/Check Recovery, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 30, 2000No. CIV 00-1072(RHK/JMM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Rick Bryant filed suit in this Court alleging that Defendant Bonded Accounts Service/Check Recovery, Inc. (hereinafter “Bonded”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) by conduct described more fully below. Before the Court are motions from each party. Bonded has moved to dismiss Bryant’s Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Bryant, for his part, has moved for an Order certifying a class of similarly situated consumers. The Court will first decide the pending…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Vicki Westcott, Administratrix of the Estate of Arden Westcott, Deceased v. City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foti v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Sonmore v. Checkrite Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Baker v. Allstate Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.