Legal Opinion
State v. Bradt
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Eloyd Estile, J.
1Opinion of the Court
• Oaudwell, J.
George 11. • Bradt was indicted, in, the Circuit Court of Plamilton. County for the alleged' violation of certain provisions of Chapter 107 of the Acts of' 1897. The Judge_ of that. Court quashed the indictment, and the State ap-, pealed .in error.
The indictment is in good form. It contains three counts, the first being preferred under Sec. 1, the second under Sec.' 2, and the third under Sec.. 6 of the Act mentioned. The indictment is undoubtedly good if the Act is. a valid law; otherwise it is bad, having no other law to .rest upon.
The Act is in these words, namely: ,
“AN ACT…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hyman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Goodbar v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. BasfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.