Legal Opinion

Scott v. Briggs Way Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1996No. S-5842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

Emorene Briggs and Roger Briggs, doing business as Briggs Way Co., operate a set net fishing business. The Briggs employed Bruce Scott in June and July 1990 to work at their Ugashik River set net site as a maintenance person and crew member.1 In June 1990 Scott and his co-worker, Ryan Connor, were working on land, moving set net buoys.2 Scott was injured when the little finger on his right hand was crushed between a buoy and a forklift.

Scott filed a complaint against the Briggs in June 1992, seeking relief under principles of general negligence, the Jones Act, and…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huffman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cavin v. State, Fish & Wildlife Protection Division of the Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Scott v. Briggs Way Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API