Legal Opinion

Manic v. Dawes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 22, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0128PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 The state appeals from the superior court’s ruling in a special action proceeding filed by appellee Pamela Manic that challenged the respondent Tucson city magistrate’s order denying Manic a jury trial. The court held that, as a defendant in a misdemeanor driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) case, Manic has the right to a jury trial. We agree and affirm the ruling.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 Manic was cited in May 2004 for two violations of A.R.S. § 28-1381, driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Redhair v. Kinerk, Beal, Schmidt, Dyer & Sethi, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Arizona Department of Economic Security v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. YbarraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API