Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stueve v. Berger Kahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 2013No. G046253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

This is one of three appeals concerning a purported Ponzi scheme set up by Attorneys Raymond A. Novell and Jay Wayne Allen to siphon off the assets of the Stueve family (Stueves)—the “heirs” (in lay terms) to the Alta Dena Dairy fortune. This particular appeal challenges the order granting the Civil Code section 1714.10 motion of Attorney Allen’s law firm, Berger Kahn, to strike the conspiracy allegations of the Stueves’ second amended complaint.

Civil Code section 1714.10 was enacted to combat “the use of frivolous conspiracy claims that were brought as a tactical ploy against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Pavicich v. SantucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Schubert v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stueve Bros. Farms v. Berger KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Cortese v. Sherwood, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Cortese v. SherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Klotz v. Milbank,Tweed, Hadley & McCloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. McKee v. Bright & Powell CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API