Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Caverly

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. January 17, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

Stovall and Caverly owned adjoining tracts of land, and the division line was in dispute. Stovall applied to have his land processioned and' the lines marked out. The processioners located the line as claimed by Stovall, and Caverly caveated their return. The trial resulted adversely to Caverly, and a judgment was duly entered' upon the verdict. Thereafter Caverly continuously and persistently trespasses on the land which was found to be included in the Stovall tract by the processioners’ return, and which is in the possession of Stovall, and persistently digs up and cultivates the land.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Martin v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Mosely v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kuhr Bros., Inc. v. SpahosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Baldwin v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. RainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Atlantic Company v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API