Legal Opinion
MTB Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 7, 2005No. 05-375CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest is before the court after argument on the complaint by one of a select number of contractors that regularly bid for the same contract to enjoin performance of a Reverse Auction Program (“RAP”) procurement administered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). Plaintiff seeks to preclude HUD from implementing a procurement procedure that allegedly violates subsections 423(a) and (b) of the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. § 423 (2000), amended by the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-347,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SP Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- KSEND v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Aeroplate Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Terry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Filipczyk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009