Legal Opinion

Stolp v. Reiter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1933No. 29,533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D1BELL, Justice.

Action to recover $18,346.06 claimed to be the balance due on the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of his stock in the Rochester Grocer Company. The defendant pleaded payment. In addition he interposed a counterclaim in which he alleged that from January 1, 1920, to June 1, 1928, he and the plaintiff were jointly interested in an hotel business in Rochester and that the plaintiff withdrew $8,875 belonging to the defendant. For this sum he asked judgment. The reply admitted that the plaintiff and the defendant were jointly interested in the hotel business in Rochester;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ertsgaard v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Hagstrom v. McDougallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobson v. DobsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Sleeter v. Progressive Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Stolp v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Lee v. ZaskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API