Legal Opinion

Ertsgaard v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1931No. 28,471PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

On quantum meruit, plaintiff, an attorney at law, had a verdict for $75 for professional services rendered defendant. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

One error assigned requires a reversal. Defendant claimed that the services were rendered upon the understanding that plaintiff would make no charge therefor. Over the objection and exception of defendant the jury was instructed that the burden was upon him to prove that the services were rendered gratuitously. That was wrong. Plaintiff relies upon an actual contract, albeit one expressed by the actions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McEleney v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Bryan v. Capital Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Brock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Topinka v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API