Hagstrom v. McDougall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to recover $7,978.23 upon a logging contract. The case was tried before Eesler, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $776.50. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the second cause of action was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action by plaintiff to recover of defendant upon a contract for getting out the forest products on certain lands in Wisconsin and delivering them at McDougall’s Spur on the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway at Winnebijou. There was a verdict for the defendant, who interposed a counterclaim claiming overpayment, and judgment rendered in *390his favor on the verdict for $851.73. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The case is before ns on a bill of exceptions.
1. The contract was between the plaintiff and another, to whose rights plaintiff has succeeded, of the first part, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Youngberg v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Sleeter v. Progressive Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Trovatten v. MineaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Stolp v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.