Stocks v. City of Irvine
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment following the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the City of Irvine because Irvine’s land use ordinances and regulations allegedly violate the Constitutions and laws of the United States and California by excluding from Irvine housing for low and moderate income people. Summary judgment was granted after the trial court held that plaintiffs did not have standing to sue.
The Facts
The complaint alleges that because of its substantial industrial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- County of San Luis Obispo v. Abalone AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing v. Westwood InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.