Legal Opinion

Washington v. Flixbus, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 5, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00212Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHARLES WASHINGTON, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00212-H-MSB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 12 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 13 FLIXBUS, INC., [Doc. No. 6] 14 Defendant. 15 On April 4, 2025, Defendant Flixbus, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Charles 16 Washington’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 17 12(b)(6) on the grounds that Plaintiff lacks standing, Plaintiff’s claims are preempted, and 18 the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 6.)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API