Legal Opinion

Roehr v. Pittman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which the parties seek to determine the ownership of a savings account in the defendant bank.

The question presented is whether the balance in a joint savings account became the property of the surviving joint depositor or constituted an asset of the estate of the other joint depositor.

The decedent, Helen Hosken, and her daughter, Ruth Pittman, executed a signature card for a joint checking account and a signature card for a joint savings account. Each signature card provided, among other things, that upon the death of one of the joint depositors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. BeesonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Heimbigner v. U. S. National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Andrews v. HochmuthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wester v. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Glenn v. Bank of California, N. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Estate of Ashenhurst v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Jarrett v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API