Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 22, 1976No. 27736, CA 5893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The personal representative of the estate of Ethel Johnson appeals from the trial court’s ruling that his inventory of the estate should include the funds in joint bank accounts to which Ethel Johnson was a signatory depositor.
In November 1973, Ethel Johnson and her son, Tom Johnson, opened a savings account, and signed an account card which provided:
"As joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common, the undersigned hereby apply for a membership and for a JOINT savings account * * * and for issuance of evidence of membership in the joint names of the undersigned as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Greenwood v. BeesonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Allen v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Ford v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Kinney v. UglowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Estate of CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Sautter v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Sautter v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of Estate of HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Lincoln v. KolskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982