Legal Opinion
Rankin v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1996No. 85147PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Justice.
Claimant, Rankin, suffered from cumulative trauma to his hands while working for respondent Ford Motor Company. The Workers’ Compensation Court, Honorable Kimberly E. West, trial judge, held that the date of RanMii’s injury for the purpose of determining Rankin’s wage rate was the date Rankin first became aware of his injury, in October 1986. The Court of Appeals, Division 1, reversed the trial court on the ground that the date of Rankin’s injury was the date of his last exposure to the conditions causing the trauma, which was March 1, 1993. Ford *40sought certiorari, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parks v. Flint Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Peabody Galion Corp. v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Utica Square Salon of Beauty v. BarronCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. BradleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Penny v. Titus, National Union Fire Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
3Cited by21 opinions
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- CNA Insurance Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- American Airlines, Inc. v. CrabbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.