Legal Opinion

Penny v. Titus, National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 5, 1995No. 85091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Judge:

Petitioner, Erlene Penny (Claimant) seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Court order finding, among other things, that the rate of compensation to which she is entitled for temporary total disability due to cumulative trauma injury was established using the “date of awarenéss”.

The parties agree the facts are not in dispute. Claimant began working for Respondent Titus (Employer) in 1976. Her duties required the repetitive handling of parts in preparation for assembly of heating and air conditioning components. In January 1991, Claimant began having problems with her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Peabody Galion Corp. v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Nuway Laundry Company v. HackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Rankin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API