Legal Opinion

Cowlitz Stud Co. v. Clevenger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2006No. 77267-3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Owens, J.

We must determine whether the last injurious exposure rule applies to petitioner Dana Clevenger’s industrial injury claim brought under the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW. Clevenger’s injury claim was initially filed in response to a low back injury she sustained while working for respondent Cowlitz Stud Company. Pursuant to the claim, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) ordered Cowlitz Stud to pay time loss benefits. The superior court reversed, holding, as a matter of law, that the last injurious exposure rule barred liability of Cowlitz Stud because…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Jenkins v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Lewis v. Simpson Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Lewis v. Simpson Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Maziar v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API