Legal Opinion

Freudenmann v. Clark & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1980No. 1537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This summary judgment case arose from a suit brought in Matagorda County, Texas, by Clark and Associates, Inc., (called Creditor) against Ben Freudenmann and wife, Kathleen Freudenmann (called Debtors) to enforce an Arizona state court judgment. The trial court granted the Creditor’s motion for summary judgment. Debtors had failed to participate in the summary judgment proceeding. This appeal by writ of error followed. We affirm.

The Creditor alleged in its original Texas petition that it had instituted suit in the Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County, Arizona; that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Masten v. MastenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Country Clubs, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. A & S Distributing Co. v. Providence Pile Fabric Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Henke Grain Co. v. Keenan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Hart v. Calkins Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Charles Brown, L.L.P. D/B/A the Charles Brown Law Firm v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., and Cam Edwards, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API