Mitchim v. Mitchim
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice.
The broad question in this case is whether, on the present record, the provisions of an Arizona divorce decree awarding alimony, attorney’s fees and costs against a nonresident defendant served with process in another state, are entitled to full faith and credit in the courts of Texas. The trial court concluded that the Arizona court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant. It rendered judgment accordingly, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed with one justice dissenting. 509 S. W.2d 720. We reverse the judgments of the courts below and remand the cause to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Walnut Equipment Leasing Co. v. Wen Lung WuTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Knighton v. International Business MacHines Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Mindis Metals, Inc. v. Oilfield Motor & Control, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. Baker Energy Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.