Legal Opinion

Hart v. Calkins Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 29, 1981No. 8949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

The question for decision is whether, in a suit to enforce a judgment rendered by a court of another state, a copy of the judgment properly authenticated pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738 (1966) 1 , is stripped of its presumption of validity, for purposes of summary judgment, solely by reason of the fact that a portion of the typewritten judgment appears to have been changed by pencil or ink interlineation. We hold that in the absence of summary judgment proof that the judgment was improperly altered subsequent to its rendition, its presumption of validity is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Colson v. Thunderbird Building MaterialsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. A & S Distributing Co. v. Providence Pile Fabric Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Hungate v. HungateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Woolhouse v. Tolchin Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Libby, Mont. v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Martin v. United States Trust Co. of New York, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Minuteman Press International, Inc. v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Schwartz v. F.M.I. Properties Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Starzl v. Starzl, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API