Legal Opinion
Nathan v. Locke
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 1930No. Docket No. 7124PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given in our former opinion filed April 28, 1930, and reported in 287 Pac. 550. The motion to file certain documentary evidence is granted.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on October 8, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on November 2, 1930.
The following is the opinion of April 28, 1930, rendered in the above-entitled cause:
NOURSE, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for contribution…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tuttle v. George H. Gilbert Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fuchs v. Parsons Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Bourke v. FriskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Automobile Insurance Co. v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.