Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Chrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 9, 2000No. 99-1017PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARR, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to dismiss a class action lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we REVERSE the judgment of the District Court, and REMAND the case for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Named plaintiffs are owners and lessors of Jeep Grand Cherokees, manufactured by DaimlerChrysler (defendant) and equipped with the Quadra-Trac four wheel drive system. They allege that they were fraudulently induced to buy or lease their Grand Cherokees based…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Irwin Klepper v. First American BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Pyskaty v. Wide World of Cars, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Terrance Golden v. Gorno Bros., Inc., D/B/A Gorno FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Harnden v. Jayco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.