(PC) Handy v. Castillo
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HANDY, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01160-NODJ-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 13 v. STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED FOLLOWING 14 DAVID CASTILLO, SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 Defendant. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 18 Plaintiff Michael Handy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 The Court issued its First Screening Order…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.