Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.

New York County Courts

Decided October 16, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard E. Delaney, J.

During the period February to April, 1973, several checks— drawn on plaintiff — subrogor’s account with defendant were stolen and forged by a third party, and then cashed by defendant, resulting in an alleged loss to plaintiff subrogee of $7,434.52. The instant action was commenced in June, 1978. Defendant urges that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5). Plaintiff’s theory is breach of contract in that defendant bank paid the forged checks and withdrew plaintiff’s funds without permission or consent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerber v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  2. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Forman v. First National Bank of WoodridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. C-1 v. Farmers BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Robinson Motor Xpress, Inc. v. HSBC Bank, USAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Harvey v. First National Bank of PowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API