Legal Opinion

Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. C-1 v. Farmers Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1985No. 47457PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

Defendant Farmers Bank appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for $207,108.07 in favor of plaintiff Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. C-l on its claim that the Bank improperly charged the Water District’s account for checks paid over forged endorsements. §§ 3-404, 4-401 U.C.C. 1

The Bank relied on two defenses: first, the “padded payroll” or imposter section of the U.C.C., § 3-405; second, the negligence of the Water District in conducting its business so that an employee could, by forging endorsements, cash checks made out to the Water District’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rigby Corp. v. Boatmen's Bank and Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Schell v. LifeMark Hospitals of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Knight Communications, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API