Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. C-1 v. Farmers Bank
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
Defendant Farmers Bank appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for $207,108.07 in favor of plaintiff Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. C-l on its claim that the Bank improperly charged the Water District’s account for checks paid over forged endorsements. §§ 3-404, 4-401 U.C.C. 1
The Bank relied on two defenses: first, the “padded payroll” or imposter section of the U.C.C., § 3-405; second, the negligence of the Water District in conducting its business so that an employee could, by forging endorsements, cash checks made out to the Water District’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Rigby Corp. v. Boatmen's Bank and Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schell v. LifeMark Hospitals of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Knight Communications, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.