Legal Opinion

Simcoe & Erie General Insurance v. Chemical Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 15, 1991No. 88 Civ. 8822 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Chemical Bank, New York Trust Company (“Chemical”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the diversity action of plaintiffs Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Company (“Simcoe”) and its subrogee, the Guarantee Insurance Company of North America (“Guarantee”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

The Parties

Simcoe is a Canadian corporation with its principal office in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Simcoe is a customer of Chemical.

Guarantee is a Canadian corporation with its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hechter v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Moore v. Richmond Hill Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. J. Sussman, Inc. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. American Home Assurance Co. v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co., New York County Courts1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concrete Materials Corp. v. Bank of Danville & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Concrete Materials Corp. v. Bank of Danville & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API