Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Isbell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1965No. A-10728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

This is an action in trespass to try title. The trial court withdrew the case from the jury and rendered judgment that the plaintiff below, Mary Isbell, a widow, take nothing. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, 387 S.W.2d 456, and Mary Isbell is Petitioner here. The defendant below, and Respondent here, is Annie Isbell, also a widow.

Mary sought to recover an undivided one-sixth interest in two tracts of land. The common sources of title were stipulated. Mary introduced four subsequent deeds in evidence, and rested. Annie offered no evidence but moved for judgment, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dahlberg v. HoldenTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Davis v. GaleTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Isbell v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Day & Co., Inc. v. Texland Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  2. Hutson v. Tri-County Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Day & Co., Inc. v. Texland Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  4. Floyd Edgar Hutson v. Tri-County Properties, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. Floyd Edgar Hutson v. Tri-County Properties, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API