Isbell v. Isbell

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This suit originated as a trespass to try title action to recover undivided interests *458in two separate tracts of land. On the motion of defendant Annie Isbell, the trial judge withdrew the case from the jury and ■rendered judgment that plaintiff Mary Is-itbell take nothing by her suit.

w-' The judgment entered necessarily decided that a deed dated April 20, 1946, from J. A. Isbell and his wife, Lizzie Isbell, to Annie Isbell conveyed the entire undivided interest and estate in the two tracts of land then vested in either or both J. A. Isbell and Lizzie Isbell. The issue…