Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1962No. 1020PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The respondent, Gary Paul Fox, was found guilty by jury verdict at a session of Rutland Municipal Court of (1) without the consent of the owner, taking and operating an automobile for his own use and pleasure, and (2) operating said motor vehicle along the public highway while his license and right to operate a motor vehicle was suspended by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. The respondent moved at the close of the State’s evidence that a verdict of acquittal be directed by the trial court, and renewed his motion at the close of all the evidence in the case. It is upon the denial of these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. State v. SanfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  4. State v. TatkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  5. State v. PerrasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  2. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  3. People v. HelcherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. BruceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  5. State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API