Legal Opinion

Velez v. City of New London

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 31, 1995No. Civ. 3:94CV02169 (PCD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

DORSEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Genero Velez alleges violations of his federal and state civil rights as well as gross negligence, recklessness, negligence, libel and slander, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants City of New London, William D. Ditt-man, Axle Bergeson, Kenneth Edwards, William Gavitt, Margaret Ackley-Clark, Donald Sloan, Richard Kistner, Bruce Rinehart, John Doe, and Richard Brown move to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons below, defendants’ motion is granted in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
  2. Hughes v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  3. Maloney v. Connecticut Orthopedics, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
  4. Fletcher v. Conoco Pipe Line Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2001
  5. Collins v. Olin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API