Fletcher v. Conoco Pipe Line Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Defendant Conoco Pipe Line Company (“Defendant”) moves the Court to dismiss Counts IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVIII, XIX, XXI, and XXII of Plaintiff Dallas Fletcher, Katherine Fletcher, Clyde Kent and Dorothy Kent’s (“Plaintiffs”) Third Amended Complaint. Alternatively, Defendant moves the Court to strike Counts VII, VIII, XIX, and XXII as duplicative pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). Plaintiffs filed Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Defendant filed a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Terlecki v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Henke v. Arco Midcon, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
- CEDARBRIDGE, LLC v. EasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ely v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Jackson County v. MERSCORP, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.