Mitchell v. LePak Trucking Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:
Respondent claimant was awarded compensation for permanent total disability resulting from heart attack, found to have resulted from stress and strain during covered employment. Petitioners seek vacation of the award and dismissal of the claim.
Petitioners assert three grounds for error. The first alleged error is that there was before the trial tribunal no reasonably competent evidence to support the finding that respondents were not prejudiced by failure of claimant to give written notice of injury within thirty days of the occurrence. The contention is not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goombi v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ColeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- In Re LoagueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lacy v. Schlumberger Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Black v. Renshaw PaintingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Hollman v. Comfort Care, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Pham v. Wuu Jau Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.