Legal Opinion
Florence Mfg. Co. v. Dowd
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided June 23, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The bill avers that complainant for a long time (viz., since about 1895) has appropriated as a distinguishing name or mark for brushes made and sold by it the word “Keep-clean,” and in 1897 registered the same as a trade-mark under Act March 3, 1881, c. 138, 21 Stat. 502 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3401). It is further averred that this trade-mark “Keepclean” is stamped or printed, not only upon complainant’s brushes or upon tags attached thereto, but upon the “individual boxes or packages containing the said brushes.” Defendants are charged in the bill with violating…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuller v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Von Mumm v. FrashU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1893
- Meyer v. Dr. B. L. Bull Vegetable Medicine Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
- Williams v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. WendoverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stephano Bros. v. StamatopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Garrett & Co. v. A. Schmidt, Jr., & Bros. Wine Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
- Max Levy & Co. v. KartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Re Barrett Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1914