Max Levy & Co. v. Kartz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
Complainant filed its bill claiming the exclusive right to the use of the word “eullet” in connection with its business and seeking to have the defendant enjoined from using this word in connection with his business. An answer and a replication were filed and upon hearing by the court it was ordered that the bill be dismissed for want of equity. Complainant appeals.
There is little controversy as to the facts. Sometime before January 1, 1895, Max Levy started his jobbing and brokerage business in broken glass and adopted the word “cullet” to describe this commodity. This word was used on his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Valvoline Oil Co. v. Havoline Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
- Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Snacks, Inc. v. SchaulAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971