Legal Opinion

Max Levy & Co. v. Kartz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1928No. Gen. No. 32,773PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Complainant filed its bill claiming the exclusive right to the use of the word “eullet” in connection with its business and seeking to have the defendant enjoined from using this word in connection with his business. An answer and a replication were filed and upon hearing by the court it was ordered that the bill be dismissed for want of equity. Complainant appeals.

There is little controversy as to the facts. Sometime before January 1, 1895, Max Levy started his jobbing and brokerage business in broken glass and adopted the word “cullet” to describe this commodity. This word was used on his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Valvoline Oil Co. v. Havoline Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  5. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Snacks, Inc. v. SchaulAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API